QNX v5.5.1 DES Package · Production-ready

Dynamic Elasticity Diagnostics for resilient institutions.

QuantisNexis™ QNX-DES™ v5.5.1 replaces fixed substitutability assumptions with state-responsive dynamic elasticity (ρ_t), delivering defensible Quantis Index™ scores, QuantisSentra™ risk signals, and prioritized action pathways for ports, climate agencies, universities, health systems, and enterprises.

Dynamic ρ_t range
−0.73 → +0.12
Governance-sensitive to cobb-douglas
Monte Carlo samples
500 / run
P10 / P50 / P90 uncertainty bands
Singapore V3 scenarios
14
SSP1-2.6 · SSP2-4.5 · SSP5-8.5
0.542NYC demo Quantis Index
AMBERQuantisSentra risk signal
RETop synergy bottleneck
25
core variables
5
intelligence pillars
50+
questionnaire scaffold
v5.5.1
DES Package release
Platform

A unified engine, not a black-box AI tool.

QNX-DES™ v5.5.1 provides the dynamic elasticity foundation (ρ_t state-responsive substitutability), while advanced layers—GTSM v3.0 event calibration, spatial QI(x,y,t) heat maps, Monte Carlo uncertainty bands, RADAR, synergy, EFQM/Baldrige benchmarking, QuantisSentra, Quantis Advisors, and Quantis Narrator—deliver transparent diagnostic intelligence at port, urban, and institutional scales.

Technical foundation — for methodology and research users

QNX Core™ is a 25-variable engine integrating BMS, ATCG, VUCA, WOWA/Orness weighting, and the master equation. The platform includes RADAR scoring, EFQM/Baldrige benchmarking, Diamond-style ESI synergy, copula dependency diagnostics, ML readiness, outcome-label workflow, and Tito-Conti advisor logic.

QNC

QNX Core™

The deterministic scoring engine. Produces the Quantis Index from normalized organizational variables and pillar logic.

QS

QuantisSentra™

Risk and decay signal layer using critical thresholds, synergy bottlenecks, anomaly flags, and trend conditions.

QA

Quantis Advisors™

Tito-Conti-based diagnosis, treatment, and review logic with sector-specific ideal profiles.

QN

Quantis Narrator™

Score-safe explanation layer. It explains QNX outputs but does not invent or alter scores.

How it works
1
Complete the questionnaireCapture organizational context, governance structure, resilience indicators, and performance data.
2
Run QNX-DES v5.5.1Three-stage ρ_t computation: Fe-sigmoid → state modulation → ATCG genome. Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation included.
3
Review dashboard outputsInterpret the Quantis Index™, Sentra flags, bottlenecks, and prioritized recommendations.
4
Export a client-ready reportUse score-safe summaries, technical notes, and leadership-facing action pathways.
Architecture

QNX v5.5.1 DES system architecture. v5.5.1 · DES Package

The public website now reflects the current production direction: QNX-DES™ v5.5.1 delivers dynamic elasticity diagnostics across dashboard, API, report, and supervised ML workflows — purpose-built for institutional and climate-sector deployment.

1
QNX Core™25-variable engine using BMS, ATCG, VUCA, WOWA/Orness, and the master equation to generate the Quantis Index™.
2
Risk LogicQuantisSentra™ highlights decay, anomaly, threshold, synergy, and tail-risk signals.
3
Decision IntelligenceQuantis Advisors™ converts diagnostics into sector-specific priorities and actions.
4
Executive NarrationQuantis Narrator™ turns engine outputs into score-safe executive summaries and reports.
01 · Client input
Input sources and assessment channels

Likert, EFQM A/B/C/D, Diamond multi-rater, RADAR inputs, cohort/history records, documents, KPIs.

Pilot
02 · Validation
Quality and structure checks

Base-result validation, numeric checks, fallback warning, and output contract checks.

Live
03 · QNX-DES™ v5.5.1 Engine
Core mathematical engine

Three-stage ρ_t computation: Fe-sigmoid environmental anchor → VUCA/G_r/Ψ state modulation → ATCG genome multiplier. Monte Carlo 500-sample uncertainty envelope. Dynamic elasticity replaces fixed CES substitutability.

Core
04 · RADAR scoring
Approach × deployment scoring

Approach × deployment scoring with RADAR-to-variable mapping.

Live
05 · Benchmarking
Maturity and award-readiness bands

EFQM/Baldrige equivalent bands, award-readiness signals, and client-facing maturity language.

Live
06 · Synergy + copula
Interaction and tail-risk diagnostics

Diamond ESI proxy, copula-style dependency diagnostics, joint low-tail risk, and variance guard.

Live
07 · QuantisSentra™
Risk and decay signal layer

Decay, stagnation, critical thresholds, anomaly signals, and trend-aware risk detection.

Pilot
08 · ML layer
Learning, feature, and trend support

Feature store, outcome-label workflow, readiness scoring, clustering, anomaly detection, and time-series utilities. Supervised ML activates after pilot data.

Data-gated
09 · Quantis Advisors™
Priority actions and treatment logic

Sector-specific Tito-Conti diagnosis, treatment actions, and review cycle.

Live
10 · Quantis Narrator™
Executive explanation layer

Template report blocks and optional LLM hook with no-score-invention guardrail.

Pilot
11 · Output + API
Reports, dashboard, and integration outputs

Dashboard JSON, report templates, API-ready output, and future branded PDF/HTML reports.

Next
Modules

One engine. Multiple sector contexts.

Each module uses the same QNX Core foundation but adapts ideal profiles, thresholds, benchmarks, and advisory language for the sector context.

QNX

Climate™

Water, infrastructure, resilience, environmental agencies.

QNX

Government™

Cities, counties, state agencies, public governance.

QNX

University™

Higher education, research centers, institutional quality.

QNX

Health™

Health systems, service reliability, governance, safety.

QNX

Enterprise™

Organizations, non-profits, consulting and performance teams.

Demo case

QNX-DES v5.5.1 applied to NYC urban flood governance.

This demonstration applies QNX-DES v5.5.1 dynamic elasticity scoring to the NYC urban flood governance case study, producing: Quantis Index, QuantisSentra flag, synergy bottleneck, copula tail-risk signal, Tito-Conti priorities, and client-ready report narrative.

Pilot demo package · NYC compound flood hazards

NYC Urban Flood Governance Under Compound Flood Hazards

Applied research case study using the quantitative organizational genomics framework. Authors: Morteza Shakeri Majd, Ph.D.; Dr. Mehrdad Rastgou.

Government / climate resilience Urban flood governance Compound hazards Pilot demo
0.535
Quantis Index™
535.3/1000 · Moderate

QNX pillar profile

NYC shows strong analytics and governance capacity, while infrastructure resilience/process stability is the main bottleneck under compound flood stress.

0.77EI
0.54RE
0.79AD
0.81IN
0.76ET
AMBERQuantisSentra™ flag
RESynergy bottleneck
0.750Low-tail probability

Client narrative: NYC demonstrates moderate resilience under high compound hazard stress. Strong planning and governance partially offset exposure, but resilience/process stability remains the key improvement target.

Tito-Conti priority areas

RankPillarActualTargetStatusPriority
1RE0.540.82WARNING0.58
2ET0.760.88STABLE0.12
3EI0.770.82STABLE0.05
4AD0.790.80STABLE0.01
5IN0.810.80STRONG0.00

Top priority: RE — strengthen flood-critical continuity pathways, cross-agency resilience drills, and capital-program triggers.

Scenario results and copula tail-risk signal

The demo uses scenario outputs from the NYC package to create a simple joint low-tail risk proxy. The resulting copula-style diagnostic flag is elevated_cohort_tail_probability.

0.54Current
0.492050 Moderate Adaptation
0.612050 High Adaptation
0.372100 No Action
Photo: PSA Tuas Mega Port, Singapore © Fortune / PSA
Singapore Case Study · QNX-DES v5.5.1

Port Climate Resilience Diagnostics — Tuas Mega Port & Jurong Port

QNX-DES v5.5.1 applied to Singapore's two major port facilities across 14 climate scenario-season combinations from Singapore's Third National Climate Change Study (V3, CCRS/NEA 2024), calibrated with GTSM v3.0 extreme sea level return periods. The dynamic elasticity parameter ρ_t shifts from cobb-douglas (NE Monsoon, partial compensation) to governance-sensitive (SW Monsoon, weakest-link dominance) within the same year.

0.79 m
West Tuas SLR (SSP5-8.5, 2100)
V3 Table 12.3 · median
+3.8°C
End-century JJAS ΔT
SSP5-8.5 · V3 Table 10.20
+53%
99.9th pct daily rainfall
SSP5-8.5 EC · V3 Ch.10
32.6%
B-pillar stress + surge
1.63m / 5m threshold
QNX-DES v5.5.1 · Tuas Mega Port · Singapore V3 × GTSM v3.0

Dynamic Elasticity Port Climate Resilience — 14 Scenario-Season Matrix

ρ_t transitions from −0.10 (cobb-douglas) under NE Monsoon (DJ) baseline to −0.73 (governance-sensitive) under SSP5-8.5 end-century SW Monsoon (JJAS). QI_DES drops from 0.318 to 0.061 — an 80.8% decline across the 14 scenarios.

SSP1-2.6 · SSP2-4.5 · SSP5-8.5 Mid-century 2040–2059 End-century 2080–2099 NE Monsoon (DJ) · SW Monsoon (JJAS)
0.318
QI_DES · selected scenario
Cobb-Douglas · ρ_t = −0.10

Table 2 — Three-Way QI Comparison (click row to inspect)

Scenario Season Fe% ρ_t QI_DES QI_CES Regime
Selected scenario breakdown

Click a row in the table to inspect full details.

ρ_t Regime Zones
Cobb-Douglas ρ_t ≥ −0.20 · partial compensation permitted
Governance-Sensitive ρ_t −1.50 to −0.20 · weakest-link emerging
Deep Gov.-Sensitive ρ_t < −0.60 · near weakest-link

Two-Port Spatial QI Comparison — Tuas vs. Jurong

Tuas Mega Port
Deltares archetype · ≥5 m MSL critical infra (CPB 2026) · B-dominant (w_B=0.45)
B · Physical
0.750
M · Monitoring
0.746
S · Governance
0.789
0.318Baseline QI_DES (DJ)
0.061Crisis QI_DES (JJAS)
GTSM RP100
Surge 0.600 m + SLR 0.79 m = 1.39 m · B_stress 27.8%
5 m CPB
Jurong Port
DHI archetype · ≥4 m MSL general (CPB 2026) · M-dominant (w_M=0.40)
B · Physical
0.680
M · Monitoring
0.720
S · Governance
0.789
0.285Baseline QI_DES (DJ)
0.054Crisis QI_DES (JJAS)
GTSM RP100
Surge 0.595 m + SLR 0.76 m = 1.355 m · B_stress 33.9%
4 m CPB
Coastal Protection Bill Regulatory Dividend
Max spatial QI gap: +0.0478 (SSP5-8.5 EC DJ) · Crisis convergence: +0.0051 (SSP5-8.5 EC JJAS)
+0.0478

GTSM v3.0 Event-Level Fe_pct Calibration

Every RP10–RP100 extreme surge event at both ports falls in the governance-sensitive zone (Fe_pct_event = 18.8–33.9). Physical infrastructure is the binding constraint under every extreme event regardless of return period or SSP scenario.

RP10 Tuas: Fe_pct 18.8 (SSP1-2.6 EC)
RP100 Tuas: Fe_pct 27.8 (SSP5-8.5 EC)
RP10 Jurong: Fe_pct 22.7 (SSP1-2.6 EC)
RP100 Jurong: Fe_pct 33.9 (SSP5-8.5 EC)
All events: Gov.-sensitive regime (ρ_env ≈ −0.77 to −0.83)
GTSM v3.0 · Deltares · Copernicus CDS

Global Tide and Surge Model v3.0 (Muis et al. 2020), ERA5-forced 1985–2014, GPD fit to 99th pct peaks. 43,119 coastal stations at ~2.5 km resolution. Nearest station to Tuas: 7.7 km. Triple-validated against Singapore V3 projections and CPB statutory thresholds.

Request Singapore report
NYC timeline demo

Scroll through the storm timeline.

A guided, event-by-event presentation that advances through the chronology like the NYC Floodline dashboard, with changing titles, metrics, and outputs as the index moves.

Timeline-driven presentation

NYC Floodline-style scroll narrative

Use the slider or the navigation buttons to move through events one at a time. The visualization updates as the timeline advances.

Scrollable chronology Event-by-event reveal Map and KPI refresh Narrative data flow
01
Selected event
Jan 2023 → Jul 2025 1 of 9 events
Post-Tropical Cyclone Ophelia

Timeline story

Storm snapshotEach step reveals the next event in sequence.
Changing KPIsPeak rainfall, accumulation, and report counts update together.
Visual progressionThe map and chart redraw to match the selected moment.

Active event panel

2.4Peak 1H rainfall
5.8Accumulation
941311 reports
Event description

Citywide flash flood emergency with severe borough-level impacts.

Research · Applied Case Study

NYC Urban Flood Governance Dashboard

This interactive dashboard presents the applied research underpinning a Cyber-Physical RM–WOWA–VUCA framework for urban flood resilience diagnostics. It integrates NOAA MRMS radar-derived rainfall, FloodNet NYC sensor data, and NYC 311 service-request records across 9 storm events (2023–2025). This work targets ASCE Natural Hazards Review and demonstrates QNX Climate™ applied to compound urban flood governance.

9
Storm events · 2023–2025
5
NYC boroughs · spatial coincidence
MRMS × 311 Pearson correlation
Data sources: NOAA MRMS RadarOnly_QPE FloodNet NYC sensors NYC 311 Socrata API MODZCTA ZIP boundaries SPEI-GD drought index
QNX Climate™ · Research Preview · NYC Urban Flood Governance · Paper 1 Live demo
Floodline NYC

Rainfall × 311 Service-Request Coincidence

QNX Climate™ · NYC Urban Flood Research Dashboard · NOAA MRMS QPE × NYC OpenData 311 · 2023–2025

MRMS · Research data311 · Socrata APIInteractive demo
Storm event timeline
Peak 1H rainfall
MRMS RadarOnly_QPE_01H sample
Event accumulation
Citywide average · sample
311 reports filtered
Across selected boroughs/categories
Hardest-hit borough

Spatial coincidence - rainfall mosaic × 311 reports

Rainfall311 dots: Flooding / Sewer / Street

Rainfall intensity × daily 311 reports

Each point is one borough on one storm event. Correlation recalculates with current filters.

BoroughPeak in/hrReportsFloodingSewerStreet
ZIP-code rainfall sensitivity layer

Most sensitive NYC MODZCTAs for next-day drainage and flooding complaints

This module presents a rainfall-sensitivity analysis for New York City ZIP code areas, pairing NOAA MRMS 24-hour MultiSensor QPE with next-day NYC 311 drainage and flooding complaints over the period May 2024 to May 2026.

24-hour lag model
ZIPs ranked
Top ZIP
Top score
Median trigger
Wet-event reports

Top 20 sensitivity scores

Ranking table

RankZIPBoroughScoreComplaintsTrigger mmPeak 24h mm

Analytical notes and methodology

  • The ranking combines total wet-event complaints, complaint lift per square mile over dry-day baseline, maximum event complaint density, and positive rainfall-to-complaint association.
  • Rainfall exposure is represented by MRMS 24-hour Pass 2 QPE at the MODZCTA centroid, paired to complaints on the following local calendar day.
  • Top-ranked ZIP codes cluster in Queens, with additional sensitive areas in Brooklyn and Manhattan. Results represent screening-level indicators rather than hydraulic attribution.
  • Future refinement may incorporate polygon zonal MRMS statistics, repeat-request deduplication, and 0–48 hour lag testing using hourly QPE.

Largest MRMS event days in the ZIP analysis window

Rain dateMax 24h mmMean 24h mm311 response dateComplaints
2024-08-07167.055.72024-08-0885
2025-07-15131.940.02025-07-1666
2025-08-0197.223.02025-08-0276
2024-08-1992.036.82024-08-20106
2025-10-1379.733.22025-10-1452
2025-10-3179.645.52025-11-0187
2024-07-0675.211.42024-07-0733
2026-03-0671.335.62026-03-0746
2025-09-0768.030.32025-09-0867
2025-05-1562.019.32025-05-1669

Method & sources

This interactive dashboard embeds representative sample data from the QNX Climate™ NYC research dataset. It operates independently of a backend service for broad accessibility.

Research sample data: rainfall grids, point clouds, and per-borough magnitudes are representative values calibrated to documented storm events. The full production system ingests MRMS GRIB2 from NCEP/AWS and live NYC Socrata 311 records in real time.
QNX Climate™ · Applied Research

Dashboard demonstrates QNX-DES v5.5.1 dynamic elasticity (ρ_t) environmental stress modelling, RM–WOWA–VUCA composite scoring, and ZIP-level rainfall sensitivity analysis. Submitted to ASCE Natural Hazards Review (primary) and International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (parallel track). Full manuscript with GIS maps, statistical validation, and robustness analysis is in preparation for peer review.

Request paper draft
Outputs

Executive-ready intelligence. Audit-ready evidence.

QNX produces structured outputs for leadership, technical teams, and pilot partners. The same engine can support dashboard views, reports, JSON/API responses, and Narrator summaries.

Quantis Index™ Risk signals Synergy bottlenecks Copula tail risk Tito-Conti actions ML readiness
Quantis Index™Composite organizational intelligence score with pillar-level diagnostics.
QuantisSentra™ risk alertsThreshold, decay, anomaly, and tail-risk signals for executive attention.
Quantis Advisors™ action mapPrioritized treatment recommendations based on sector and weakest diagnostic areas.
Quantis Narrator™ summariesScore-safe executive explanations that reference engine output, not invented scores.
Get in touch

Start a conversation. We will guide the rest.

The QuantisNexis team responds to all pilot, demo, API, and white-paper inquiries directly. Institutional onboarding, account setup, and subscription billing are handled through a guided intake process.

Request pilotEmail pathway for institutional pilot discussions.
Book demoEmail pathway for a QNX v4.2 demo conversation.
Request portal accessContact the team to set up your institutional portal account.
Pricing

Pilot first. Scale when ready.

Start with a guided QNX pilot, then move into team and enterprise plans as usage, reporting needs, API requirements, and client workspaces grow.

Pilot

Best for validation

For organizations testing QNX with one project, one use case, a guided workflow, and a client-ready demonstration report.

Custom
Scoped by pilot size and reporting needs
  • Guided intake and QNX run
  • Quantis Index™ and pillar profile
  • QuantisSentra™ risk signal summary
  • Client-ready dashboard/report export
  • Implementation guidance session
Request pilot pricing
Enterprise

For API and governance

For institutions needing API access, SSO, custom deployment, data governance controls, and deeper onboarding support.

Custom
Based on deployment, users, and integration scope
  • API access and integration planning
  • SSO and advanced authentication roadmap
  • Custom hosting/deployment options
  • Governance and audit-ready documentation
  • Dedicated onboarding and support
Talk to sales

QuantisNexis follows a pilot-first engagement model. Pricing is scoped to each institutional context, with subscription tiers introduced as pilot validation is completed.

Pilot-ready

QNX-DES v5.5.1 — production-ready for pilots, research validation, and partner deployments.

QNX-DES v5.5.1 Package delivers dynamic elasticity scoring, two-port spatial QI diagnostics, Monte Carlo uncertainty envelopes, and GTSM-calibrated event-level forcing. The Singapore and NYC case studies demonstrate production-grade V&V capability.